Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ºÒ¼Ò¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×ÀÌ ¼Ò¾Æ Ä¡Àº ¼¶À¯¾Æ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ ¼¼Æ÷È°¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇ׿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

EFFECTS OF FLUORIDE MOUTHRINSE ON CELL ACTIVITY OF GINGIVAL FIBROBLASTS OF CHILDREN

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1997³â 24±Ç 1È£ p.204 ~ 219
À̵¿Çö, À̱ԹÌ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̵¿Çö (  ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ º¸°Çȯ°æ´ëÇпø º¸°ÇÇб³½Ç
À̱Թ̠(  ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
¼¼Æ÷¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇØ Ä¡Àº ¼¶À¯¾Æ¼¼Æ÷¸¦ ¹è¾çÈÄ ºÒ¼Ò¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×À» 1ºÐ°£ Àû
¿ëÈÄ, µµ¸³Çö¹Ì°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¼¼Æ÷ÇüÅÂÀÇ °üÂû°ú [3H]-thymidineÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ
DNA ÇÕ¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ, MTT assay¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ä¡Àº ¼¶À¯¾Æ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ È°¼ºµµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿© ´Ù
À½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ³»·È´Ù.
1. ºÒÈ­³ªÆ®·ý ¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×À» °¡ÇÑ °æ¿ì, 0.05%, 0.2% ³óµµ¿¡¼­ ¼¼Æ÷ÇüÅ°¡ µÕ±Û¾îÁö°í ¼¼Æ÷
µ¹±âÀÇ ºÎºÐÀûÀÎ ¼Ò½ÇÀ» º¸ÀÌÁö¸¸ ¹è¾ç½Ã°£ÀÌ Áö³¯¼ö·Ï ÇüÅÂȸº¹À» º¸¿´´Ù.
2. 0.1% ºÒÈ­¼® ¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×À» °¡ÇÑ °æ¿ì´Â µÕ±Ù ¼¼Æ÷ÇüÅÂ¿Í ¼¼Æ÷µ¹±âÀÇ »ó½ÇÀ» º¸ÀÌ°í ÇüÅÂ
ȸº¹ÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
3. Ä¡Àº ¼¶À¯¾Æ¼¼Æ÷ ¹è¾ç 1ÀÏ, 3ÀÏ° ºÒ¼Ò¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×ÀÇ DNA ÇÕ¼ºÀÌ °¨¼ÒµÇ¾úÁö¸¸ 0.1% ºÒ
È­¼® ¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×¸¸ÀÌ ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ºñÇØ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³·¾Ò´Ù(p<0.05).
4. Ä¡Àº ¼¶À¯¾Æ¼¼Æ÷¿¡ ºÒ¼Ò¿ë¾×À» Àû¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ì, ¹è¾ç3ÀÏ° 0.2% ºÒÈ­³ªÆ®·ý°ú 0.1% ºÒÈ­
¼®À» Á¦¿ÜÇÏ°í´Â Àû¿ë½Ã°£¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ ´ëÁ¶±º ¼öÁØÀÇ ¼¼Æ÷È°¼ºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
5. 0.05%¿Í 0.02% ³óµµÀÇ ºÒÈ­³ªÆ®·ýÀ» ºñ±³Çϸé, 0.05% ³óµµ°¡ 0.02% ³óµµº¸´Ù ³ôÀº ¼¼
Æ÷È°¼º ¾ïÁ¦¸¦ º¸À̳ª À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¼öÁØÀº ¾Æ´Ï¾ú´Ù(p>0.05).
ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇÏ¿© º¼ ¶§ ÇöÀç ºÒ¼Ò¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×À¸·Î »ç¿ëÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â 0.2% ºÒÈ­³ªÆ®·ý°ú
0.1% ºÒÈ­¼®À» ½ÇÇè½Ç¿¡¼­ Á÷Á¢ Ä¡Àº ¼¶À¯¾Æ¼¼Æ÷¿¡ °¡ÇØÁú °æ¿ì ¼¼Æ÷µ¶¼ºÀ» º¸À̸ç, 0.05%,
0.02% ºÒÈ­³ªÆ®·ýÀº ¹è¾ç±â°£¿¡ µû¶ó ¼¼Æ÷È°¼ºÀÇ È¸º¹°æÇâÀ» º¸À̹ǷΠºÒ¼Ò¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×Àº ºÒ
È­³ªÆ®·ýÀÌ ºÒÈ­¼®º¸´Ù À¯¸®Çϸç, ³óµµ´Â 0.02% ºÒÈ­³ªÆ®·ýÀÌ ³·Àº ¼¼Æ÷È°¼º ¾ïÁ¦¸¦ º¸À̹Ç
·Î Àû´çÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The use of fluoride is one of the most effective methods for caries prevention.
Fluoridation of public water supply has been recognized, for many years, as an
effective way to reduce dental caries. The fluoride supplement has been recommended
when the natural fluoride was unavailable or below the optimal range. However the
mechanism of caries prevention by fluoride has not yet been clarified and it is well
known that an overdose of fluoride results inacute and chronic toxicity, especially dental
fluerosis. Fluoride mouthrinsing solution is widely used in dentistry due to its
effectiveness in carrying anticariogenic action. Understanding the effects of fluoride
mouthrinsing solution on human gingival fibroblasts will provine the safety rationale for
its use during the caries preventive therapy.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of fluoride
mouthrinning solution on the human gingival fibroblast in vitro. The human gingival
fibroblasts were cultured from healthy gingiva on the extracted deciduous teeth of
children.
Cells were inoculated into a 24-well plate with 1¡¿104 cells/well of
medium at 37¡É, 100% humidity, 5% CO2 incubator for 24 hours. And the
cells were counted by using the hemocytometer at each designed study. Human gingival
fibroblasts were cultured in growth medium after one minute application range of
0.02%-0.2% NaF solution and 0.1% SnF2 solution. The cells used in this
study were between fifth to eighth passage number. The cell morphology was examined
by inverted microscope and cell proliferation was measured by incorporating
[3H]-thymidine into DNA. DNA synthesis by human gingival fibroblasts
was assessed by [3H] uptake assays while the cell activity was measured
by MTT assay.
Each concentrated fluoride mouthrinsing solution was estimated for its biocompatability
with fibroblasts by the tissue culture technique.
The results of this study were as follows :
1. It was observed that at 0.05%, 0.2% NaF mouthrinsing solution the cytoplasmic
proceses became globular. When 0.1% SnF2 mouthrinsing solution was
applied, the cytoplasmic process and cell morphology were disappeared.
2. DNA synthetic activity was reduced regardless of the concentration of the fluoride
mouthrinsing solution. However, the result is statistically insignificant except 0.1%
SnF2 mouth rinsing solution(p<0.05).
3. Our results indicate that 0.02%, 0.05% concentrations of NaF mouthrinsing solution
caused minimal cytotoxicity. But 0.2% NaF and 0.1% SnF2 concentration
were a significant difference between the cell activity in the experimental group and
control group(p<0.05).
The results suggest that direct exposure to fluoride solution inhibits gingival fibroblast
activity. Therefore, for the most effective use of fluoride use, lowering the concentration
of fluoride mouthrinsing is advisable because it maintains biocompatability and free ion
in the oral fluid.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI